NEW ZEALAND STRANGE OCCURRENCES SOCIETY
  • Contact
    • Disclaimer & safety issues
    • NZSOS Privacy Policy
    • Encounter check list
    • Ghost Advice
    • FAQs
  • Photos
    • Orbs
    • Orbs explained
    • Flare
    • Mists
    • Pareidolia, apophenia
    • International photos
    • Uncategorised
    • Analogue photos
  • Ectoplasmic Residue Blog
    • Blog index
  • NZSOS
  • Methods
    • Investigation procedure
    • Paranormal investigation equipment
    • Science & pseudoscience
    • Thoughts on ghosts
  • Videos
  • Media
  • Links
    • International links
  • Spooked book
    • Blurb
    • Media & reviews
    • Other NZ paranormal books
  • Paranormal Novel
  • Contact
    • Disclaimer & safety issues
    • NZSOS Privacy Policy
    • Encounter check list
    • Ghost Advice
    • FAQs
  • Photos
    • Orbs
    • Orbs explained
    • Flare
    • Mists
    • Pareidolia, apophenia
    • International photos
    • Uncategorised
    • Analogue photos
  • Ectoplasmic Residue Blog
    • Blog index
  • NZSOS
  • Methods
    • Investigation procedure
    • Paranormal investigation equipment
    • Science & pseudoscience
    • Thoughts on ghosts
  • Videos
  • Media
  • Links
    • International links
  • Spooked book
    • Blurb
    • Media & reviews
    • Other NZ paranormal books
  • Paranormal Novel
Search

'The Strangers' by Matthew Manning

30/12/2015

0 Comments

 
Yesterday I read this book - 'The Strangers' by Matthew Manning (W.H.Allen, London, 1978) - from cover to cover. It is totally fascinating and absorbing. Anyone else here read it?

Manning writes of a period in the 1970s during which, by the method of automatic writing, he was in contact with a past inhabitant of his family home, Robert Webbe. Manning lived with his parents and siblings in the Queens House in Linton, Cambridgeshire, a listed building that was originally built in the early 1600s and extended in the front in 1731.

If you don't know about Matthew Manning, he was forced to leave boarding school because of the dramatic poltergeist activity he caused which terrified the other pupils. He later found that doing automatic writing and drawing made the poltergeist activity stop, as it provided another outlet for his psychic energy.
Although somewhat overshadowed by Uri Geller, Kreskin and others with more desire for fame, Manning is clearly among the most interesting people alive in terms of his purported psychic feats, both mental and physical. He lives in England and is a spiritual healer - see his site MatthewManning.net


I really don't know what to make of 'The Strangers'. The information gathered psychically by Manning, (from several people, apparently), contains extensive, detailed information about various people who occupied the house at various dates, their extended family, and other townspeople of Linton. There is a wall in the study on which are written (purportedly by Webbe and maybe others) over 500 signatures or names of people who visited the house at one time or other. (See these photos [link no longer works]from another book. *I wonder if the names are still visible today.)

Later, Manning researched the history of the extended Webbe family and other townspeople by consulting various church records, etc, and was able to untangle some apparent inconsistencies in the information he'd received. This makes his account more believable.


Other family members, Manning's father in particular, experienced the presence/s in the house in various ways. Manning claims to have seen a full body apparition of Robert Webbe on two occasions; once early on, once near the end of his communications. His descriptions of these experiences are most interesting.

If it is true that Manning did the psychic communication first and the research later, then what he uncovered is truly incredible and a total game-changer. At this point, I could start looking into skeptical analyses of Manning's account, but I can pretty well imagine what they're going to be. Naturally I have my own questions and doubts; but I'd rather think about what's in the book, as it is presented, without it being 'ruined' for me by others' opinions (because that's just what they will be). Maybe later.

Manning is an engaging writer. I would also recommend his earlier book, 'The Link' which is his own account of his psychic experiences and life. I would very much like to meet Matthew Manning one day and discuss things paranormal with him.

*Are the signatures on the wall still visible? Scroll to p6 of this PDF [link no longer works]for the answer. Hint: someone has been a total and utter clot! (And I wonder if the Steve Webb, painter and decorator, whose ad is at the bottom of p6, is a descendant.)

Cover of 'The Strangers' by Matthew Manning, W.H. Allen 1978 edition. Photoby James Gilberd, New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society
Cover of 'The Strangers' by Matthew Manning, W.H. Allen 1978 edition. Photo: J.Gilberd
Matthew Manning's signature on fly leaf. Could someone tell me what '8 VI 7g' refers to?, Photo by James Gilberd, New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society
Matthew Manning's signature on fly leaf. Photo: J.Gilberd.
p40 spread of 'The Strangers' showing Robert Webbe's signature on the study wall, and photos of Queens House, Linton, Cambridgeshire. Photo: James Gilberd, New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society
p40 spread of 'The Strangers' showing Robert Webbe's signature on the study wall, and photos of Queens House, Linton, Cambridgeshire. Photo: J.Gilberd.
This Google Streetview shows the house now.
Advert for matthew Manning's New Zealand healing orkshop tour in August 1980, from the NZ Psychic Gazette, photo by James Gilberd
Advert in Issue #13 of 'The N.Z. Psychic Gazette' of August 1980. The article following the ad (not shown) suggests Manning also visited NZ in June 1979. (I bought a pile of these old magazines from the same Wellington 2nd-hand bookshop as the Manning book.)
0 Comments

Photography and the Paranormal

27/12/2015

6 Comments

 
This article summarises and expands on some aspects of the talk I gave at Australia Paracon 2015, at Katoomba, NSW. While the views expressed here might seem closed-minded and sceptical to some, I seek to clear up some of the misunderstandings surrounding photographs that purport to show paranormal phenomena so that, with careful consideration, we can put them to one side and move forward in trying to find good, solid evidence of genuine paranormal phenomena.
 
In the Victorian era, when Spiritualism was at its peak, photography was still quite new and few people had a working knowledge of it, so photographers such as William H Mumler were able to exploit people with the simple trick of double exposure to make recognisable 'spirits' appear in portrait photos (which is similar to what ghost photo phone apps do today). He would leave a space in the portrait's composition for the 'spirit' to be inserted, printing it from another negative - often a portrait of a deceased family member. (Mumler sometimes got his choice of spirit personality terribly wrong, landing himself in hot water.)
 John J Glover and spirit, by Mumler, Photography and the Paranormal article by James Gilberd
John J Glover and spirit, by Mumler. (Wikipedia Creative Commons license)
But the more enduring and mysterious historical ghost photos were not deliberate fakes; they were more likely taken by accident, and not while looking for ghosts in haunted locations. This is also the case today. While there are many deliberately faked ghost photos online, the majority of photos we receive for analysis at Strange Occurrences were taken innocently; that is, with no intention of recording any kind of paranormal phenomena. Often the anomaly is noticed later while reviewing on a computer, which is when people get a bit worried, or sometimes totally freak out.
 
A little background on me: I've been a full time professional photographer in Wellington, New Zealand, for several decades. I have a degree in photography, have worked in photographic retail, and have run photography courses and workshops for years. So, my level of knowledge in photography is in stark contrast to my understanding of how anything in the field of the paranormal works! Despite ten years of book learning, field work and writing on the subject, I don't feel much closer to an understanding of any of it. In fact, I now realise that I know less about the paranormal than I thought I did when I started out! Compared to anything paranormal, photography is really pretty simple.
I co-founded the Strange Occurrences paranormal group (now called the New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society) in 2005. Analysing photos was the one thing we could claim some expertise in, with several other team members also being serious photographers. We receive emailed photos from around the world for analysis, enough now to see some patterns emerging.
Photographs showing possibly paranormal phenomena can be classified into two types (loosely, because some photos fall into both categories):
(1) Photographic anomalies; things that don't, as such, exist in reality but are caused by photography. Examples: orbs, lens flare, light streaks, 'ectoplasmic mist'.
(2) Psychological effects; the interpretation of the visual data in the photograph. This is often explained by pareidolia (discussed later).
Note: some or all of the photos we receive may in fact show genuine paranormal phenomena; but we can't be absolutely sure. We can only offer an opinion, and this will include a rational option which will fit into category 1 or 2, as above.
Ectoplasmic mist, photography and the paranormal, article by James Gilberd of Strange Occurrences
Ectoplasmic mist? This photo falls into both of the above categories. It’s likely due to vapour lit by flash (a photographic anomaly). You can probably see various figures in it, too (pareidolia – a psychological effect). Photo used with permission.

Orbs

The topic in my Paracon Australia 2015 talk that caused most discussion (and consternation) was the orb. I was a little surprised, as I thought the standard explanation for orbs was widely accepted these days; but lately there's been an increase in claims of orbs being spirit manifestations, or paranormally significant in other ways.
 
We treat every photo – orb or otherwise – received for analysis as an individual, unique case, and we're never absolutely certain of our expressed opinion; but most orbs can be explained by the camera flash (or LED illuminators in cellphone and video cameras) lighting up dust particles, tiny flying insects, or moisture droplets passing by very close to the lens - within centimetres, sometimes millimetres in the case of cellphones with extremely short focal length lenses.

When the flash hits a dust mote it creates a tiny but very bright highlight. Because the camera lens is focussed farther out, this point of light is rendered out of focus in the photo, recording (usually) as a translucent disc - a very large 'Circle of Confusion' (C.O.C. - see diagrams below). This is your classic orb.
Compact camera diagram showing orb capture area, paranormal orbs explained, James Gilberd New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society co-founder
Compact camera diagram showing orb capture area. Diagram: J.Gilberd
Picture
DSLR orb capture diagram - usually no orbs will appear. Diagram: J.Gilberd.
Diagram: how orbs appear in photos, Circle of Confusion (C.O.C.), paranormal orbs explained, article by James Gilberd, New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society
Diagram: the out-of focus image of the dust mote highlight forms a translucent Circle of Confusion (CoC) where it intersects the sensor or film plane. (Sharp focus would occur in space behind.) Actually, the light from the point of dust focusses through the lens in the shape of a cone, and where the image sensor truncates this cone a circular image is formed. It overlaps the sharp image of the tree, recording as a translucent disc. (This theory also predicts oval orbs, which occur near the edges of photos – the cone is truncated at an angle.) Diagram by J.Gilberd
C.O.C. and subject overlap in orb photo, circle of confusion, paranormal orbs explained, James Gilberd
Resulting image: C.O.C. and subject overlap in orb photo. Diagram: J.Gilberd
Other factors may contribute to the C.O.C. effect to produce orbs, and add variety to them:
  • Camera lenses are never quite perfect, so the orb may have a coloured corona (due to 'chromatic aberration' - different wavelengths (colours) of light focussing at different distances, like white light through a prism separating into rainbow colours).
  • There may be patterning within the orb, which could be partly due to lens imperfections and partly the digital sharpening and compression of the photo data into a small JPEG file.
  • The orb may have an all-over colour such as red, blue, purple or green. This may be due to the optical design of the lens, particularly the anti-flare coating that makes the lens appear coloured when you look at it from a certain angle.
  • There may also be other environmental factors at play determining the overall colour of orbs. I'm still studying all of these possibilities. It’s a continual learning curve.
As camera design changes, so do orbs. Today's orbs look different to those from 5, 10, or 15 years ago. Orbs were uncommon until the turn of the 21st century, when digital cameras took over. Film cameras seldom produce orbs because of the larger scale of the cameras and optics, meaning dust, etc, cannot usually be brought into focus sufficiently to appear in any coherent form (The C.O.C. would be spread over a wide area and basically invisible.)
Orb photo, orbs explained
Photo used with permission.
Orb photo, orbs explained, hexagonal orb
Photo: J.Gilberd
Orb photo, orbs explained, raindrop orb
The top two orbs above are from dust, with the second example taking on the hexagonal shape of the lens aperture. (Most orbs are round because the aperture blades are fully retracted.) The third is from a raindrop. Photo: J.Gilberd

Lens flare

Lens flare is another common photographic anomaly often mistaken for paranormal phenomena. Flare is caused by bright, intense light entering the lens, bouncing around and messing up your photo. The light source can either be within your photo or outside it. Lens flare produces not only orb-like anomalies but also light streaks and other odd shapes, which can be multi-coloured. If the lens is scratched or dirty the flare patterns can go really crazy and start to look like very strange things.
Ways to reduce lens flare are:
  • Avoid photographing directly into a light source (unless you actually want the flare effect).
  • Use a lens hood or shade (usually only available for big DSLR lenses).
  • Use your hand, sleeve, notebook or wallet to block the light from shining into the lens (like shading your eyes when looking into glare).
Picture
This orb is caused mainly by the sun shining into the lens (lens flare). The photos are cropped in and enhanced a little to make them clearer in print (as were most of the other photos in this article). Photo used with permission.

Blur

Movement blur is a common anomaly that can occur when photographing in low light. It can be due subject or camera movement, or both, when the camera has automatically selected a long shutter speed to gather enough light for the exposure. The resulting blurry streaks and general randomness can easily be mistaken for something paranormal.

Most cameras have the option of Night mode, with or without flash. When using this mode, (the ‘crescent moon and stars’ symbol) a common mistake is to think the photo has been taken once the flash has fired, and then to move the camera too soon after. In low light conditions the shutter will remain open for up to a few seconds after the flash and you’ll get a blurry scene, maybe with streaks from light sources. (Man-made lights, such as street lights, actually flicker at 50 or 60 cycles per second according to the AC mains electricity, which may show as lines of dashes or pulses.)
Paranormal photo blur caused by movement, photo by James Gilberd
This set-up shot was taken using Night mode + flash. The blur in front of me is where I moved to after the flash fired. In this case, the blur is from subject movement; the camera was fixed on a tripod. Photo: J.Gilberd
If you want to avoid camera-movement blur, either use a tripod or hold the camera firmly on a shelf, ledge, table, or vertically against a wall, making sure it doesn’t move at all during the exposure, which can last for several seconds. Listen closely and you’ll hear the shutter close. (Note, this method will not prevent blur caused by subject movement.)
 
You can tell if long exposure blur is the likely cause of your ghost or UFO photo from the Exif data (see below). A long shutter time, such as 2 seconds, is the giveaway, but you could get noticeable blur at 1/15 of a second.
Paranormal photography false positive, camera movement, blur, light streak, photo by James Gilberd
Blur caused by camera movement: a street light on a misty night (camera set to Night mode). Note the pulses in the light streak. Photo: J.Gilberd

Experiments

If you want to see how any of these effects work with your own camera, you can try to create them deliberately:
  • Shoot photos with the camera pointing towards the sun (or full moon) to various degrees (being careful to avoid looking directly at the sun). Look at the flare effects.
  • Try the same at night with man-made bright light source. See what you get.
  • At night, put the camera on Night mode with flash on and take a photo, deliberately moving the camera just after the flash goes off. See what happens.
  • In a dimly lit room, bang some cushions together to create a cloud of dust then quickly take a flash photo through the dust. Note the type of orbs you get.
  • Stand under shelter with rain falling very close by, and take some flash photos out into the night. Note how raindrop orbs differ from dust orbs.
  • If it’s a cold enough night, try breathing out strongly over the top or beside the camera then taking a flash photo. You may get an ‘ectoplasmic mist’.
  • Try cigarette smoke and compare with above.
  • Take flash photos with your cellphone camera while holding a human hair or something similar across the lens and flash. It’s easier with someone else holding the hair while you shoot. You might see an ectoplasmic limb!
Doing this type of experiment is the best way to understand what your own camera can do, and to learn to recognise photographic anomalies when they occur in the field.

Analysing photos, Exif data

When analysing digital photographs, it’s important to view the Exif data, which is a packet of information attached to the photo file. It tells many things, such as; camera model, date and time of the photo, shutter speed, lens aperture, lens focal length, ISO setting, flash mode, whether the flash fired, and more besides. Exif data can be read in Windows, in Photoshop and other image processing software, and (preferably) by downloading an Exif data reader (Exif Reader is good freeware; it's small, safe, easy to use and comprehensive in showing Exif data, which you can then selectively copy and print).

I’ve been trying to avoid photography-speak, but to interpret the Exif data you'll need to know about photography and how cameras work. I can’t adequately explain the technical terms here, sorry. Look them up online, or visit Wellington and do one of my photography courses!
 
Photos posted online are stripped of this Exif data, and they will have been reduced in size and compressed. Also, their origin is often unknown and/or highly dubious. For these reasons we don't analyse or even offer opinions on photos posted online. For proper analysis, we need to see the original camera version of the photo, complete with Exif data, and know who and where it’s come from. First-hand images from the photographer are preferable, since they will have also witnessed the event photographed.
 
It's also useful to view other photos taken at the same location and/or around the same time. These can give more information about the scene photographed and the camera. For example, there may be a camera fault that shows up in multiple photos; or, when things in a photo start to look like something else (pareidolia, simulacra), we can see the same view from different positions and times.

Pareidolia

Pareidolia is when we see human-like shapes or forms (simulacra) and faces in random visual data, such as cloud, rocks or tree bark. It’s sometimes called apophenia, and a more recent term is matrixing. It’s been explained as a hard-wired survival mechanism all humans have for recognising danger. Also, as babies the first thing we learn to recognise is our parents’ faces, so face shapes get imprinted on the brain very early. From then on we can all see faces and human-like figures easily in anything. If you look for faces in photos, you’ll find them!
paranormal photo, false positive, pareidolia example, lens flare, New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society
A combination of lens flare (photographic anomaly) and pareidolia (psychological effect). Photo used with permission.
The lower the resolution of a photo and the more fuzzy the detail, the more random data will be contained in it for us to see faces and figures in. That shadowy area behind the partly opened wardrobe door might look like it conceals an imp or demon, but it’s usually just our brain ‘joining the dots’. Due to electronic image processing, those shadow areas that contain little or no image information often get sharpened up and made more contrasty so that it appears there’s something there that isn’t. There’s a good article on pareidolia on Wikipedia that’s easy to follow and goes into some depth.

Conclusion

simulacrum, paranormal photo, New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society
The apparent human figure (a simulacrum) is perhaps due to separate background shapes lining up in a particular way. Other photos of the garden would have helped establish the cause of this.
I could go on with more examples of photographic anomalies (some older, film-based ones can get really hairy and are harder to analyse!), but it’s apparent that most things showing up in photos yield to rational explanation.

By experimenting with your own camera, you can build your understanding of how these anomalies occur, learn how to recognise them elsewhere, and find out more about photography in the process.

So where does that leave us? It’d be easy for me to conclude that it’s impossible to photograph something like a ghost, UFO, or cryptid, so we shouldn’t bother trying; and that all such photos of anything considered paranormal are either deliberate fakes or optimistic misinterpretations of the so-called photographic evidence. But I don’t think either of these conclusions is a valid one, based on experience to date. So far, I’ve never managed to photograph any of the (possibly) paranormal events I’ve experienced, for a variety of reasons and poor excuses, but that doesn’t mean I don’t think it can ever be achieved. With improvements in visual technologies new possibilities are opening up; and of course, avoiding stubbornness, one has to be patient and persistent. We keep trying and live in hope.
ectoplasm mist, breath mist, pareidolia, photo by James Gilberd
It's possible to see shapes in this mist (caused by exhaling on a cold day, breath lit up by flash). Photo: J.Gilberd

An afterthought

While writing this, I watched a video post showing a video camera setup with an effective shutter speed of a trillionth of a second. It can film a pulse of light moving through a plastic bottle of water, and other incredible, seemingly impossible things. Immediate reaction: ‘Nah, the video’s a hoax.’ But it isn’t. The ‘trick’ is explained and it’s clever stuff. It is but one example of innovative technology showing us a new aspect of nature that we hadn’t imagined possible. There’s quite a history of this and there will of course be more to come. Let’s hope that some of it might be used to solve some of the problems presented by the paranormal and supernatural.

- James Gilberd, December 2015

Links

ASSAP article on analysing photographs
Photo page on NZSOC site
'Orbs explained: not all are paranormal'

Free paranormal photo analysis service

We at New Zealand Strange Occurrences Society have always offered an informed opinion, free of charge, to anyone willing to email their unexplained photographs to us for analysis.

All photos and correspondences are treated as confidential, but sometimes we will ask permission to publish sent in photos on our website (as in this post, for example). This is only done with express permission from the owner of the photo, who may choose to remain anonymous.

Email your photo and relevant information to: strangeoccs@gmail.com
6 Comments

    Ectoplasmic Residue

    is a blog by James Gilberd - leader and co-founder of Strange Occurrences. Views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the Strange Occurrences team.
    To see blogs sorted by topic, go to BLOG INDEX

    RSS Feed

    Author

    James Gilberd is an amateur paranormalist, writer and musician, and a professional photographer, living in Wellington, New Zealand.

    Archives

    February 2021
    June 2019
    January 2019
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    October 2013
    July 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All
    Book Review Paranormal
    Book Review - Paranormal
    General Paranormal

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Contact
    • Disclaimer & safety issues
    • NZSOS Privacy Policy
    • Encounter check list
    • Ghost Advice
    • FAQs
  • Photos
    • Orbs
    • Orbs explained
    • Flare
    • Mists
    • Pareidolia, apophenia
    • International photos
    • Uncategorised
    • Analogue photos
  • Ectoplasmic Residue Blog
    • Blog index
  • NZSOS
  • Methods
    • Investigation procedure
    • Paranormal investigation equipment
    • Science & pseudoscience
    • Thoughts on ghosts
  • Videos
  • Media
  • Links
    • International links
  • Spooked book
    • Blurb
    • Media & reviews
    • Other NZ paranormal books
  • Paranormal Novel